20 MarWhat are the mechanics of the decision to modify?

Whether you are applying directly to your lender or claiming eligibility under HAMP, the practical decisions are all to be made by the lender. You do whatever you can to set out your side of the proposed bargain with a clear set of accounts showing money in and money out. The need is to demonstrate a guaranteed slice of your monthly income that can be devoted to paying a reduced instalment. So list everything you are obliged to pay to keep body and soul together, from food to utilities to transport to health insurance, and so on.

Without the modification, this is going to be negative, i.e. on paper, you are spending more than you earn. The “trick” is to show enough to cover a modified instalment, perhaps with a tiny slice of money left over for the inevitable emergencies. If the modified instalment you prove can be paid is enough to keep the lender less unhappy, the modification will be agreed on a trial basis. But if the minimum instalment the lender requires will leave you in negative territory, your offer to modify will be rejected. Why reject a good faith offer? Because people who have to juggle monthly payments to fit into the available money almost always default again. Your income must cover all outgoings.

If the modification is agreed in principle, it moves on to a formal trial basis. In theory, this is a three-month trial, but the reality is that the lenders usually drag their feet and are very slow to convert the trial into a permanent modification. This ought not to affect you. After all, you are paying the agreed amount. But there is a problem. Until the modification is made permanent, the lender will report you to the credit rating agencies as still delinquent. This is grossly unfair.

You are paying what is agreed. But, as the law stands, the unpaid balance each month will be reported as late. Thus, the longer the trial period is allowed to drift the worse your credit score will become. This requires action. You should contact the three major agencies, Experian, Equifax and TransUnion, and ask that details of the trial be added to your credit file. That way, even though your score will continue to decline, all other lenders will be able to see what is going on.

So what is happening during the trial other than you proving your ability to pay the reduced instalments on time? The answer is slightly disheartening. It is always in the lender’s interest to collect as much money from you as possible on your mortgage. But, while you stay in default, the lender is entitled to foreclose at any time. If the lender judges it will make more money by foreclosing rather than accepting the reduced payments over the rest of the term, it will always foreclose.

It is simply collecting as much cash from you as possible before triggering your eviction. No-one said the home loan industry had to work fairly, and it does not. The only time the lender will accept a permanent modification is when the accounts clearly show more profit in keeping the mortgage alive. While the housing market remains depressed, the odds are in your favor. But if resale prices start to rise, the odds will swing against you.

23 NovESET will do the best job of protecting your digital world

Job-loss protection

Hi there, guys . . .

I have had this product on my PC for just under two years, to date, and just want to say how satisfied I am with its overall performance. There is no sign of any false alarms and it does not need a pat on the back every so often for the supposedly good work it is doing, like not a few other Internet Security products around. Eset Smart Security 3.0 just simply does its work efficiently and very quietly.

It is not for nothing that this company has the highest success rate as far as Virus Bulletin (Website: www.virusbtn.com) 100 awards is concerned, of all Internet Security products tested to date. I heartily reccomend it to anyone who is either looking for a good Internet Security program for his/her PC, or who is perhaps just not satisfied with the performance of his/her current Internet Security program.

The four integrated ( into one) components of Eset Smart Security, i.e. the Antivirus, the Anti spyware, the Personal Firewall and the Anti spam component work very well together to produce a really excellent product for its price, which is not much for the quality program you will get.

The options for purchasing Eset Smart Security 3.0 are as follows: As a first time client you will have to purchase a 1 or 2 year user license (new). Once payment is confirmed, the company’s control centre will send the client the username and password of his/her license by e-mail.

Once this initial term has expired, the client then has the option of renewing said license for additional terms of 1 or 2 years. The cost of the latter will amount to approximately 66% of the price of a new license. These prices should be easily obtainable from the company’s website, mentioned in the next paragraph.

One is also able to download Eset Smart Security from the ESET website at www.eset.com for a trial period of 1 month. When the homepage opens, just look for, and click on the purple heading called . . . ESET – Antivirus Software with Spyware & Malware, and you will see the program advertisement there, with a tab for “purchase” or “trial”.

This is really a nice gesture from the ESET company, because 30 days are more than enough time to see for oneself just how well this program will perform on one’s PC. I have just visited their website and discovered something that I was not even aware of . . . version 4 of the program has now been released. I am definitely going to upgrade. If version 4 is any better than its predecessor, it will be just outstanding!

Something one must be aware of when installing this program, or its sister program, NOD 32 Anti virus and Anti spyware, which, by the way, is on an absolute performance par with the program under review, is that . . . these ESET security programs DO NOT, under any circumstances, tolerate any OTHER internet security programs, so . . . it is very important to completely uninstall whatever other internet security program you may have on your PC, if you would like to test these 2 babies out!

I, for one, do not blame Eset Smart Security for not wanting to work with other, less impressive, internet security programs. Why should it? It wants to be in charge of your PC’s overall protection, so that if it messes up, which it absolutely won’t, it, alone, will get the blame. Why should it get the blame for the mess another internet security program causes?

The company’s logo reads: “ESET – WE PROTECT YOUR DIGITAL WORLD.” I most certainly agree.

Yours respectfully,

Mayan Viljoen.

This review also appears in the English review community “dooyoo” under my Username, there, Mayan820.

My name is Mayan Viljoen, I am married and I live in Gordon’s Bay, South Africa, a seaside town approximately 55 odd km’s from Cape Town proper.

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)